Suggested Read: The Bakken Boom – A Modern Day Gold Rush

Those familiar with EOCM and our history will recall our assessment of the increasing challenges to oil supply growth,  particularly domestic oil supply and production. In recent months, especially in the context of next year’s presidential election, there has been growing discussion about the Bakken formation and whether it might move the U.S. toward energy independence. Given the realities of supply growth and current decline rates, we remain highly skeptical of these prognostications. We recently found this fun and interesting educational article posted on “The Oil Drum” energy blog entitled The Bakken Boom – A Modern Day Gold Rush, which we believe is worthy of a read. The article examines the history of major U.S. resource discoveries and developments, such as the 1849 U.S. California Gold Rush and the giant oil field discovery of Prudhoe Bay, to that of the present-day Bakken play.

Go to http://www.theoildrum.com/node/8697 to read the full article, The Bakken Boom – A Modern-Day Gold Rush, by Derik Andreoli on ”The Oil Drum” energy blog. Derik Andreoli is a Senior Analyst at Mercator International, LLC (dandreoli@mercatorintl.com).

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SPR Oil Release: Evidence of Something Bigger?

Written by Farrell Crane, EOCM Portfolio Manager

Last week, Scott posted a blog entry detailing the growth in Saudi Arabia’s internal energy demand and its potential impact on the kingdom’s ability to meaningfully increase exports. He postulated that this factor may have influenced the IEA announcement that 60 million barrels of oil would be released from member countries’ strategic petroleum reserves.  A great deal of speculation has emerged in the wake of that announcement, questioning its efficacy and its rationale.  Facts have also emerged.  So far, the announcement has not generated the results anticipated by the IEA or the U.S. administration, as oil prices, which dropped initially on the news, have returned to their pre-announcement price.  In addition, OPEC has responded that the release may cause them to reduce production so as to avoid an oversupply situation in the market.  Yesterday, the IEA took things one step further stating that additional releases may be warranted. 

Having had the good fortune of working with the late Matt Simmons, I know he would be thinking that OPEC’s unresponsiveness and the IEA release are revealing something bigger.  As many of you may know, Matt was one of the first to seriously question Saudi Arabia’s claimed spare capacity.  Is it possible that the SPR release is needed because Saudi simply does not have the ability to turn on the spigot today?  This is not to say that productive capacity cannot be increased. But rather, that excess capacity is simply not readily available and will not be available absent additional exploration and production activity – drilling more wells.

Let’s look at the recent facts: The ongoing conflict in Libya took approximately 1.6 million barrels of daily production off the world market (roughly 1.3 million barrels of which was available for export). Almost immediately, Saudi announced its intention to make up for the lost barrels by increasing production from its claimed spare capacity. No production increase was forthcoming. OPEC then met to discuss whether a production increase was warranted. That meeting ended in a heated debate with no agreement to increase OPEC production. Despite the lack of an agreement, Saudi claimed that it would supply the barrels needed. Again, no increase has occurred.  The members of the IEA subsequently agreed to release 60 million barrels from their respective strategic petroleum reserves over the next 30 days (an amount approximately equal to the lost Libyan production). OPEC responded that they will consider reducing production to insure that the global market is not oversupplied (at a time when rising oil prices are considered a threat to the fragile economic recovery?).  The IEA then says that additional releases may be warranted.

While these actions and the attendant saber rattling may simply be political or a reflection of differing views on the world economy and the global oil supply and demand situation, the facts are also entirely consistent with a true inability of OPEC and Saudi in particular to add production at this moment in time.  Recall that Saudi recently summoned the major oil service providers indicating a desire to increase rig count by more than 30% over the next 12 to 18 months in an effort to “maintain supply.”  The lack of a timely production response from Saudi and the IEA announcement might in fact be an indication that Saudi simply does not have readily available spare capacity to bring to market.  This is surely speculation as OPEC’s spare capacity remains an unaudited unknown. Nonetheless, the conclusion is consistent with the facts. And, if true, this development reflects a serious global energy predicament.  The world has been riding on a global crude oil production plateau for more than 6 years now. Real, readily available spare capacity may be minimal, causing the developed nations of the world to draw on inventories intended for genuine emergencies to mask a reality that would reverberate though the global growth paradigm.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Implications of Saudi Energy Demand

Interesting read in the Wall Street Journal on June 23, especially in light of the recent announcement by the IEA that member countries would release 60 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves over a 30 day period — not a wise move with respect to oil price volatility and price spike risk later this year or next (but that is a subject for another blog).

The article points to four noteworthy observations on our part:

•     First, Iran’s ability to go nuke (weapons, not power generation) is a potential powder keg in an already volatile region of the world.  As the WSJ article points out, not only is there a need for nuclear power in Saudi Arabia (yes, that’s right, despite having the world’s largest oil reserves, the kingdom needs nuclear power to satisfy its domestic energy demands), there is the likelihood that others in the region will follow suit.  If Iran has a nuke, then others want nukes and will have them.  In our opinion, the geo-political risk associated with oil and natural gas disruptions is increasing.

•     Second, note the rapid growth in internal oil consumption in Saudi Arabia.  It has more than doubled in about 12 years.  The more oil Saudi Arabia consumes, the less oil there is for export, which is the principle source of revenue for the kingdom and also means less supply available for importers of crude.

•     Third, note that gasoline prices in the kingdom are subsidized.  While the economist in the article states that eliminating gas subsidies would curb demand, we believe the reality is, given the political turmoil in this part of the world of late (witness Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, Yemen, and Syria), that it is doubtful this subsidy would be lifted.  In fact, the government of Saudi Arabia earlier this year instituted a handout to the people of the kingdom in excess of $100 billion (as a “stimulus”).  Once subsidies and handouts are given, they become expected by the recipients…seldom are such endeavors one time in nature.

•     Fourth, and related to the third point above, the social costs of producing oil in Saudi Arabia are significant. The subsidies and handouts are essentially a cost of producing oil in the kingdom.  As we (at EOCM) have been saying for some time now, the era of cheap, easy to access oil is over…even in Saudi Arabia.

Commentary and article shared with you by Scott Gill, EOCM Portfolio Manager.  To contact Scott, or anyone on the Energy Opportunities investment team, please email Angela Hall at ahall@energyocm.com.

WALL STREET JOURNAL
JUNE 23, 2011

Rising Saudi Thirst for Oil Drives Plans to Go Nuclear

By ANGUS MCDOWALL

DUBAI—Rapid population growth, wastefulness and economic development are driving up Saudi Arabia’s thirst for energy, steadily reducing the amount of oil available for export and driving the kingdom’s interest in nuclear power.

By eating into its own oil supplies, Saudi Arabia risks reducing a formidable spare capacity that it could pump to counter disruptions to output elsewhere.

Spare capacity is also a potential weapon in the kingdom’s efforts to keep Iran in check, senior royal Prince Turki al-Faisal said in comments this month reported by The Wall Street Journal. Prince Turki also implied that if Iran develops nuclear weapons, Saudi Arabia would be forced to follow suit—a scenario that shadows Saudi nuclear-energy plans.

The Saudi government has said it will present a comprehensive energy strategy later this year. Prince Turki said the kingdom was working on developing wind, solar and nuclear sources to avoid sapping oil exports.

But a culture of consumption remains. From dairy farms that run air conditioning for tens of thousands of cows to the Middle East’s largest fleet of private jets, the world’s leading exporter of crude oil is burning more and more energy.

Domestic subsidies keep fuel prices low and give citizens and companies no incentive to cut back.

Peak-time power demand—fueled largely with crude oil—rose by 10% last year, according to the country’s deputy electricity minister.

Some economists say that if Saudi Arabia’s current energy-consumption growth rate of 7% a year continues unabated, the kingdom within 20 years will burn the equivalent of almost all its recent daily output—more than eight million barrels a day—or around two-thirds its total production capacity.

“They’re really within, just mathematically, 20 years of having very little oil to export,” said Brad Bourland, chief economist of Jadwa Investment in Riyadh. “I think it’s a very significant medium-term challenge for them in how they turn it around.”

Saudi officials, and some analysts, have lower projections for consumption growth.

A year ago, Khalid al-Falih, chief executive of state energy producer Saudi Arabian Oil Co., known as Saudi Aramco, said that if left unchecked domestic energy consumption would sap three million barrels a day from crude available for export by 2028. Those numbers are still viewed as correct, Saudi officials said.

Until this year, some analysts believed the kingdom would slash subsidies to slow consumption. The cost of Saudi Arabia’s energy subsidies was second only to Iran’s in 2009, at around $35 billion, or a tenth of Saudi Arabia’s gross domestic product, according to BP Co. PLC. But after unrest shook other Arab states, the ruling al Saud family began pouring nearly $100 billion into the economy to make life cheaper and easier for most citizens.

“As an economist, I say if you want to slow that growth of energy consumption, raise prices,” said Mr. Bourland. “Saudi Arabia pays a very large opportunity cost by not selling oil outside, where it makes a gigantic profit.”

“There was a recognition in the past year or so that demand was growing too fast and they needed to get a handle on it. But now they have to shore up support through cheaper prices,” said Jamie Webster, senior manager at the market intelligence service at PFC consultants in Washington.

The government has been looking more closely at atomic energy. Last year, the government set up the King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy, or KA-CARE, to formulate policy on nuclear power.

An agreement with French nuclear developer Areva SA soon followed, leading to expectations the kingdom is considering one or more nuclear plants.

Saudi Arabia will unveil a national energy policy this year outlining how much electricity is to be produced by nuclear plants, and in what time frame, said a KA-CARE spokesman.

“Saudi Arabia’s well behind the curve in getting into nuclear generation, but I’d anticipate they do need to move forward on this,” said PFC’s Mr. Webster.

New safety concerns arising as a result of the crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant haven’t put a crimp in the kingdom’s energy strategy, a Saudi offical said.

Other options are limited. Electricity plants face stiff competition from petrochemical factories in buying the kingdom’s limited quantities of natural gas. Saudi Aramco is raising its natural-gas production levels, but it has struggled to locate new gas fields after several years of dedicated exploration.

A Saudi official said Saudi Electricity Company was burning 1.1 million barrels a day of crude oil in power stations. Oil analysts say that figure rises during Saudi Arabia’s sweltering summer months.

The electricity ministry said it hopes to cut consumption with efficiency measures, including improvements to power stations and new standards for air conditioning units. But with demand rising so quickly, they can at best delay the problem.

The kingdom says it now has a production capacity of around 12.5 million barrels a day. Officials have previously set an eventual target of 15 million barrels a day of maximum sustainable output capacity, but haven’t recently said they are contemplating an increase from the current level.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Peak of Conventional Crude?

Spotlight on IEA World Energy Outlook 2008 – The Peak of Conventional Crude?

In November of 2010, the International Energy Agency (IEA) issued its annual World Energy Outlook, offering its most recent global energy forecast. Of significant note was the world oil production forecast contained in the IEA’s New Policies Scenario.

World Oil Production Chart Released by IEA:
 

IEA World Oil Production Chart

The significance of the forecast is embedded in the IEA’s conclusion that global conventional crude oil production has in fact peaked. Moreover, as indicated by the light blue area of the chart, maintaining flat crude oil production will require a significant increase in production from “fields yet to be developed or found” – something on the order of 20 million barrels per day in less than 10 years.

All expected supply growth will have to come not from conventional crude production but rather from growth in natural gas liquids and “unconventional oil,” which includes production from tar sands, oil shale production, and biofuels.

This outlook not only confirms the existing and ongoing oil supply challenges, but also supports the need for increasing levels of capital spending directed at the finding and developing of new conventional supplies and increasing production from more difficult unconventional sources.

– L. Farrell Crane
Portfolio Manager, Energy Opportunities Capital Management

See original article at: http://www.iea.org/weo/index.asp/.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

China November Passenger Car Sales Rise to Record 29%

The increasing demand for oil in the world’s developing economies, like China and India, continues to be the principal driver of global energy demand growth.  Given that oil is primarily used as a transportation fuel, increases in new car sales within the developing economies creates corresponding increases in the demand for oil and oil-based products like gasoline and diesel fuel.  In 2009, passenger car sales in China rose nearly 50% from 2008 as China surpassed the U.S as the world’s largest automobile market. Passenger car sales in China have continued to grow at an accelerating pace, reaching new record highs in November 2010.

Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) — China’s passenger-car deliveries to dealers rose to a record in November as customers rushed to take advantage of government incentives supporting vehicle-buying that may expire at the end of the year.

Sales of passenger cars including multipurpose and sport- utility vehicles increased 29.3 percent to 1.34 million in the month, higher than the previous record of 1.32 million in January, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. The pace of growth was the fastest since April.

Stimulus measures in China including a consumption-tax rebate for smaller vehicles, subsidies for rural car-buyers and incentives to trade in older models are all due to expire at the end of the month. Demand is being spurred by customers anticipating an end to the policies, said Yu Bing, an auto analyst at Pingan Securities Co. in Shanghai.

“Consumers who expect the stimulus policies to be discontinued next year are bringing forward purchases before time runs out,” Yu said. “There is little reason to support the extension of the tax rebate and vehicle trade-in policies, given robust industry growth.”

Passenger-car sales rose 34.9 percent to 12.45 million in the 11 months to November, the automakers group said today.

While demand growth may slow in 2011, carmakers such as General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. continue to add new models.

GM, Ford

GM introduced Baojun, a new “affordable” brand, on Nov. 22 to grab share from local automakers such as BYD Co. and Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd. and will begin selling the line next year. Ford opened 40 dealerships in China on Nov. 25 and plans to add a further 26 by the year’s end as it aims for record sales in the country.

Total vehicle sales that include trucks and buses surged to 1.697 million, 26.9 percent more than a year earlier, the association said. For the 11 months through November, total vehicle sales rose 34 percent to 16.4 million.

The stimulus measures helped China’s industry wide vehicle sales jump 46 percent last year to 13.6 million, surpassing the U.S. for the first time to become the world’s largest national automobile market.

Total vehicle sales in China may rise to 18 million this year, compared with an earlier forecast of 17 million, Xiong Chuanlin, the association’s vice secretary-general, said today at a briefing in Beijing.

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Kae Inoue at kinoue@bloomberg.net.

This article shared with you by Farrell Crane, EOCM Portfolio Manager. To contact Farrell, or anyone on our investment team, please email Angela Hall at ahall@energyocm.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Oil Service and Energy Infrastructure Industries Poised to Benefit Meaningfully in 2011

Over the past two weeks, several large integrated and national oil companies have announced major spending plans for their oil and gas operations.  The most recent came from super major Chevron announcing a whopping 31% increase in capital spending in 2011 compared to 2010, with the increase split about evenly between U.S. operations and international operations (note that 76% of total spending is designated toward international).  Such spending plans bode well for the international oil service companies as well as related infrastructure providers.

a.    $26 billion spending plan by Chevron ($22.6 billion for upstream oil and gas projects):
http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article239120.ece

b.    $90 billion spending plan by Kuwait Petroleum Company and $60 billion spending    program by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company:  http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Kuwait+Petroleum+spend+five+years/3900694/story.html

c.    $80 billion spending program by Ecopetrol:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-16/ecopetrol-to-invest-10-6-billion to-boost-output.html

d.    $63 billion spending program by Sonatrach:
http://www.ennaharonline.com/en/economy/5277.html

Scott B. Gill
Energy Opportunities Capital Management, LLC

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

China Adds to Its Stake in Latin America

China continues to make massive investments in foreign countries to secure its long-term energy needs.  Below is another example of China’s reach into Latin America.

  1. Chinese national oil companies have signed 6 agreements to invest $40 billion in Venezuela through 2016.
  2. Includes both direct investment as well as loans.

The following article is shared with you by Scott Gill, EOCM Portfolio Manager. To contact Scott, or anyone on the Energy Opportunities investment team, please contact Angela Hall at ahall@energyocm.com.

CNPC, Sinopec, Cnooc Sign Venezuela O&G Deals
by  Simon Hall & Wan Xu

Dow Jones Newswires

Friday, December 03, 2010

BEIJING (Dow Jones Newswires), Dec. 3, 2010

China’s three main state-owned oil companies have strengthened their ties to Venezuela’s energy sector, signing six agreements and increasing their investments to a planned $40 billion dollars.

The deals are the latest of a string of multi-billion dollar South American ventures signed by Chinese companies in recent months, aimed at acquiring major chunks of the continent’s rich resources and at helping fuel China’s economic boom.

Among the agreements signed was one by China National Petroleum Corp., President Jiang Jiemin and Venezuela Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez, for the joint development of the Orinoco basin Junin 4 oil block, the Chinese company said Friday in its in-house newspaper. It said the agreement had been signed Wednesday.

The cost of developing Junin 4, capable of producing 400,000 barrels of crude daily, could be as much as $16 billion, with the block developed as a 60:40 joint venture by state-owned Petroleos de Venezuela SA and CNPC, the two companies said in April when they agreed to a preliminary pact.

Agreements were also signed with China Petrochemical Corp., known as Sinopec Group, and China National Offshore Petroleum Corp., known as Cnooc Group, Venezuela’s Ministry of Energy and Petroleum said in a posting on its website.

Sinopec agreed to work with PdVSA in developing the Junin 1 and Junin 8 blocks, which could each produce up to 200,000 barrels a day of crude, and to participate in building the 200,000-barrel-a-day Cabruta refinery to process Junin crude, it said.

Cnooc signed an agreement to join the Marical Sucre natural gas project, which could produce 1.2 million cubic feet of gas and 37,000 barrels of condensate daily, the ministry said.

Apart from direct investments by the companies in specific projects, China has bankrolled Venezuela with a series of credit-for-oil deals, including a $20 billion loan in April.

That credit, half in dollars and half in Chinese yuan, is being used for a range of infrastructure projects, and is to be repaid by future oil deliveries.

“Venezuela has become one of the most important suppliers of crude oil and refined oil projects to China…we have become the third-largest supplier of hydrocarbons to the Asian country,” Energy Minister Ramirez was quoted as saying in the website posting.

The Chinese companies had, in all, agreed to invest “at least” $40 billion in Venezuela’s oil and gas sectors by 2016, the ministry said.

Officials from Cnooc and Sinopec were not available for comment on the agreements.

Some of the agreements stem back to December 2009, when a raft of preliminary pacts were announced in Caracas.

One project that hasn’t been mentioned in announcements this week was a plan initialed last year for Cnooc to help in the development of Venezuala’s eastern Boyaca 3 heavy oil block.

On Nov. 28, Cnooc and its Argentina partner Bridas agreed to pay BP $7.06 billion dollars for its 60% stake in the South America-based Pan American Energy.

That deal came two months after Sinopec paid Spain’s Repsol $7.1 billion for a 40% share of its assets in Brazil.

Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

This article shared with you by Scott Gill, EOCM Portfolio Manager. To contact Scott, or anyone on the Energy Opportunities investment team, please contact Angela Hall at ahall@energyocm.com.

Article can also be found at:

http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=101871&hmpn=1

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment